An Apology:
May 19, 2009
In my younger years, I wrote poems about the boy I loved, and named him ‘Parasite’.
Of course, we must take into consideration that in my younger years,
I wore shuffle socks and
followed soap operas and
learnt dance routines to Canadian pop songs.
I’m muddling time now, memory betraying me so that everything up until this point is a custard of Sunday afternoons , my father’s hands, getting a rabbit for my 9th birthday, and my first period.
As a child,
I believed my sister’s word gospel and hid behind my brother’s door while he rehearsed flirtations with girls from the neighbouring school, and learnt to sing his favourite tracks off our collectively-owned copy of Pop Shop 36.
I thought my grandfather untouchable,
Before I noticed his bigotry and I battled with the truth of the man versus the obligation to only speak of the dead in golden terms.
I expected to live with my parents forever,
took glee in spitting on mosquito bites,
obeyed commands from my older-wiser-impressive friend to practice French-kissing on my pillow.
In my younger years,
I punished you for every moment received and unreturned.
I really did believe I loved you – it felt similar to descriptions in Sweet Valley High novels, snuck in shadow on late afternoons in the school library.
Presumed
Imposed
Coerced
you,
poor little thing, who wanted nothing more than to
laugh and
learn to jive-dance and
achieve a position on the cricket team.
I believed my dead grandmother a ghost, dead pets ghosts, Std 3 teacher…
Now you are ghostly.
And I’m older now,
with more room in me for ghosts.
And I’m learning that a child raised on indulgence, dangerously called ‘romance’ in music, poems, adolescent pulp fiction
sullies
sulks
debases
her own chances at the entire affair from the start.
And I see that I was a bully.
That it was me doing the damn parasiting,
So that I was as impressed by my proclamations of love as I was by my new LP.
And all you wanted was to be a boy
who played with beetles,
and won at marbles, sometimes.
Editorial: Summer Lovin’
April 23, 2009
Editorial: Summer Lovin’
So, the month of love and Hallmark cards is done, and I can creep out of my single girl’s shameful closet.
I got dumped for Valentine’s day.
Don’t feel sorry for me, I had bigger fish to fry; a little dumping was nothing. And he wore terrible shoes anyway, and was far too in need of a mother for my liking. He liked those sandals with the woven straps that only Germans should be permitted to wear. And even then, they shouldn’t be allowed, but they’re German and that means they’re scary and I’m certainly not going to stop them. Apologies to Germans everywhere, but you terrify me.
Valentine’s came and went and roses were given and dinners were had and single people ranted about capitalism and the meaningless of it all. I couldn’t leave the house that evening. Flatmate and I wanted to go for dinner - single girls on the town, laughing, drinking wine and watching the couples of the city make eyes at each other and sweat through their romance.
But we couldn’t.
We’re tired of looking like a couple.
This isn’t paranoia.
A few months ago, while out for breakfast, we requested two glasses of water and when brought a single glass with two straws carefully placed, we realized that we’d been mistaken for lovers. Like two characters at Pop Tate’s in some liberal version of an Archie comic.
“Um, it’s just, uh, I thought you were, you know…” stuttered Waitress as I questioned the glass situation. I have never actually seen a person flee before. She fled.
It’s happened many times. We ain’t batting for the other team, folks, we’re just finding it hard to hook up.
There’s a new trend-word out at the moment. Bromance, referring to the unusually close bond between two heterosexual males.Valentine’s day, across town, two of my most caveman male friends meet for dinner. One is celebrating his birthday, the other arrives with a gift. The two spend dinner making smalltalk and worrying about whether their body language suggests they are engaged in the Valentine’s woo.
Oh it’s all so complicated.
I scouted the couples I know. All stayed in on Valentine’s.
Only one pair went out. To Spur at Ushaka. I love Spur, but it’s not exactly the Official Restaurant Of The Subtle Seduction. And as for Ushaka, well, I’m told there was a man wandering through the grounds serenading folks with Dave Brubeck’s ‘Take Five’ on his saxophone. Beautiful. Still, if I’m gonna get Wet and Wild and loony by Cupid’s bow, I’d rather it not be on the supertubes, you know?
I had a boyfriend once (it ended badly, surprise) who was perfectly adequate in the romance department. He took his cue and dished up the flattery and smoochy bric-a-brac when necessary. But on Valentine’s day we were not allowed to communicate. Not even a flirty SMS. Nothing. He said it was too much pressure. Something about commitment, something, something, fear, something, change of subject, something, the Blue Bulls are bastards, pass me the remote, something, something.
Truth is, I don’t want to hate this stuff. I don’t want to use Bridget Jones logic and curse the smug marrieds and phone up my single friends and drink until I’m slurring about my freedom.
In Class One, I put a Valentine’s card in my crush’s chairbag. He was good at colouring inside the lines and I thought he was dreamy. He cried and told on and the teacher made me eat my lunch alone at break. Things haven’t really changed that much.
Still, we won’t complain.
Happy month of March everyone. Ding dong cupid is dead.